This is in response to Chris’ assertation that spam’s not that big of a deal and doesn’t need government intervention. I figured I’d lob an opposing viewpoint over the net here rather than cluttering up his comment section.
Really, its not that big of a deal. People that think we need a government solution to spam probably should not be allowed on the Internet.
It’s not a big deal if you’re 1.) a power user 2.) with one account that has 3.) strong spam blocking and 4.) e-mail filtering.
It is a big deal if any of those four don’t apply to you.
For the average user, having an AOL account or a Juno account where 95% of e-mail is spam (even after spam blocking done on the server side), it’s a big deal.
And for the power user, it can still be a problem. I have a dozen e-mail accounts I check multiple times a day (each for different sites). They get varying amounts of spam… my main one is now averaging over 200 spams a day. Many are captured by Spamcop’s blacklist and my custom blacklist. Many more are flagged by PopFile. But quite a few still get through.
Even with a combination of blacklists, filtering, Bayesian analysis, and special hotkeys, it’s a substantial waste of my time and resources. Plus it really drives me up the wall.
Now I’m not saying that the feds getting involved in the fight against spam is the best of ideas, but as much as technology has fought spam, something needs to be done. Whether it’s a harsh federal law or SPF or permission auditing, I’m not sure, but with a 100% increase in the volume of spam I receive in less than a year, this thing is growing to epidemic proportions.
Unrelated to my argument, but have you noticed how a lot of spam now is offering you “larger balls and penis!” I picture these guys sitting behind a computer sending out e-mail thinking, “It worked for me!”